Gujarat High Court

SCA/2428/1988 of KETAN N TRIVEDI Vs NATIONAL DAIRY DEVLOPMENT BOARD on 22 December 2000

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2428 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAVI R. TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2428 of 1988

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAVI R. TRIPATHI

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES

to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KETAN N TRIVEDIVersus NATIONAL DAIRY DEVLOPMENT BOARD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BP TANNA for Petitioner MR BR SHAH for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE RAVI R. TRIPATHI

Date of decision: 22/12/2000

ORAL JUDGEMENT

The present petition is filed by the petitioner against the action of the respondent Board, namely, not absorbing the petitioner to the post of Executive category (Class I), after successful completion of training period. During the discussion it is given out that the petitioner is now established in life at some other place and therefore, he is not interested in actual absorption in the respondent Corporation. However, it was submitted that the matter may be decided for the questions involved in the petition.

2. The Court cannot take academic exercise.

Therefore, the petition is disposed of as not surviving.

Rule is discharged. No order as to costs.

22nd December 2000��(Ravi R. Tripathi, J.)

karim*

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead