Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/12489/2023 of VIKAS KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 26 December 2023
-1- 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-12489-2023 Date of Order:26.12.2023 Vikas Kumar and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for Mr.
107IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-12489-2023 Date of Order:26.12.2023
Vikas Kumar and another
Versus
.....Petitioners
State of Punjab and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present:Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate forMr. Jaskamal Singh Grewal, Advocate,for the petitioners.
*****
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of thepetitioners from the hands of respondents no.4 to 9.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners aremajor and have married against the wishes of respondents no.4 to 9 and havesought protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger fromrespondents no.4 to 9. Their marriage certificate evidencing their marriage is onrecord as Annexure P-3. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated18.12.2023 (Annexure P-4) to respondent no.2.
Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3-State only.
On the asking of the Court, Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab acceptsnotice on behalf of the State.
Page 1 of 2
Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value ofthe documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction torespondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Police District Khanna, DistrictLudhiana, Punjab to decide the representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitionersand grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It isclarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners fromlegal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would notbe understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on thevalidity of the marriage of the petitioners.
Disposed of
26.12.2023geeta
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No.Whether reportable:Yes/No.
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…