Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMPM/1735/2018 of RIYAZUL HAASSAN @ BHURA Vs STATE OF HP on 31 December 2018

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M) No 1735 of 2018 Decided on: 31.12.2018 __________________________________________________________________ Riyazul Hassan @ Bhura ………..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ……….Respondent

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

Cr.MP(M) No 1735 of 2018

Decided on: 31.12.2018

__________________________________________________________________

Riyazul Hassan @ Bhura ………..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ……….Respondent __________________________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? [1]

For the Petitioner : M/s Naresh K. Sharma and Hem Kanta Kaushal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Mr. Dinesh Thakur and Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Amit Dhumal, Deputy Advocate General.

__________________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

Sequel to orders dated 10.12.2018 and 24.12.2018, ASI Ramesh Chand, P.S. Dharampur, District Mandi,, H.P. has come present alongwith records. Mr. Dinesh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, has also placed on record status report prepared on the basis of the investigation carried out by the investigating agency and same is taken on record.

2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.

1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

3. In view of the aforesaid, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file afresh in accordance with law, if so required and desired.

31[st] December, 2018 manjit

(Sandeep Sharma),Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead