Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/9029/2022 of KULWANT SINGH Vs STATE OF HP AND ANR on 30 December 2022
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9029 of 2022 Decided on: 30th December, 2022 ______________________________________________________ Kulwant Singh ....Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …Respondents _______________________________________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.9029 of 2022
Decided on: 30[th] December, 2022
______________________________________________________
Kulwant Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr.
…Respondents
_______________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. A. Sayed, Chief Justice The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
_____________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Adarsh K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
A. A. Sayed, Chief Justice (Oral)
The petitioner, who is posted as an Instructor Fitter, seeks his transfer from the present place of posting at Government Industrial Training Institute, Bogdhar, District Sirmour, H.P. on account of his adverse family circumstances. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would make a fresh representation to respondent No.2-The Director, Technical Education Vocational and Industrial Training Himachal Pradesh Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, H.P. and direction may be issued to decide the proposed representation in a time bound manner.
2. In the circumstances, we permit the petitioner to make a fresh representation to respondent No2. If such representation is made within ten days from today, the same shall be decided by respondent No.2 within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.
3. The writ petition to stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(A.A. Sayed)
Chief Justice
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge