Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/3831/2012 of SURI DASS NEGI Vs STATE on 31 December 2014
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.3831 of 2012-D Date of Decision: 31.12.2014 Shri Suri Dass Negi & another …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & another ..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. For the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.3831 of 2012-D
Date of Decision: 31.12.2014
Shri Suri Dass Negi & another…Petitioners.
Versus
State of H.P. & another
..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]No.
For the Petitioner:
Mr. I.D. Bali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dalip Khachi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: M/s R.S. Verma, H.K.S. Thakur, Addl. AGs., with Mr.R.M. Bisht, Dy.
AG., for the respondents. .
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, submits that petitioners shall approach the respondents clearly bringing out the circumstances under which their case is covered by the decisions rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No.6007 of 2008,titled as Balbir Singh Thakur and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, on 06.08.2010 as also CWP No.1807 of 2010, titled as Prem Raj Versus State of H.P. & others and other connected matters, 05.05.2010.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. No other point is urged.
3. Leaving the questions of law open, it is open for the petitioners to approach the respondents, within a period of one week from today. On receipt of such request by the appropriate authority, the same shall be considered on its merits, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks, by affording adequate opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioners. Needless to add, the authorities shall pass a reasoned order, which shall be communicated to all concerned, including the petitioners.
With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
December 31, 2014 (Purohit)
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.