CRM-M/50120/2017 of MAMTA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017

CRM-M-50120-2017 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH

Sr. No. LO

CRM-M-50120-2017 |Date of decision : 29.12.2017—__ Petitioners Mamta and another VERSUS.

State of Haryana and others

..... Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

Present: |Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate

for the petitioners. ©

FE FE

SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

The present petition has been filed seeking protection of life and liberty as the petitioners fear that respondents No.4 to 8 (parents andother relations of petitioner No.1) will cause them bodily harm as theirmarriage has been performed against their wishes.

Petitioners No. 1 and 2 are major and the same is proved bytheir Certificates (Annexures P-1 and P-2).

In view of above, | deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to ensure that life and liberty of the petitioners be protected by providingthem adequate protection. The representation (Annexure P-4) already madeas well as the facts mentioned in this petition shall be kept in mind by him.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SUDHIR MITTAL)

JUDGE.December 29, 2017Ramandeep Singh _Whether speaking / reasonedYes/NoWhether ReportableYes/ No