Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/58/2000 of KANTIBHAI JETHABHAI SOLANKI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 15 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 58 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 58 of 2000
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANTIBHAI JETHABHAI SOLANKIVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR AMIT J SHAH for Petitioner MR SAMIR J DAVE, APP, for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 15/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner prayed for direction to the respondent to hand over the investigation of the case arising out of Entry No.16/99 of Chotila Police Station to any other agency which this Court feels just and proper.
3. Reply to the special criminal application has been filed and therefrom I find that in all the complaints which have been filed from time to time, the police authorities have taken appropriate action and more than three times inquiry has been conducted by different police officers but it is found to be only a case of suicide committed by the son of the petitioner.
4. In view of this fact which is revealed from the reply and not controverted by the petitioner by filing rejoinder thereto, I do not find any merits in this petition and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted stands vacated. No order as to costs.
�����(S.K. Keshote,J)
zgs/-