Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50074/2017 of MANOJ KUMAR & ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS on 28 December 2017
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50074- of 2017 Date of Decision:28.12.2017 Manoj Kumar and another ... Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present : Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. G.S.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
Manoj Kumar and another
CRM-M-50074-of 2017]Date of Decision:28.12.2017_.. Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and others... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SAANDHAWALI
Present :.Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.G.S. SANDHAWALITA, J. (Oral In the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., thepetitioners seek directions to provide protection to their lives and libertyfrom the private respondents No.4 to 8, who are stated to be relatives ofpetitioner No.2.
It is pleaded that petitioners have got married on 22.12.2017 inShri Aadi Shakti Ved Pathshala (Regd.) Marriage certified is appended asAnnexure P-3. The photographs of the marriage have been appended asAnnexure P-4. It is further submitted that the date of birth of petitionersNo.1 and 2 are 03.10.1983 and 03.05.1984 respectively and they are morethan 30 years of age. In respect of age proof, photocopies of Matriculation|Examination certificates issued by Punjab School Education Board of boththe petitioners are appended as Annexures P-1! and P-2
A representation dated 22.12.2017 (Annexure P-5) has beenfiled with respondent No.2 in this regard and resultantly this Court has beenapproached.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Suveer Sheokand, Addl. A.G,Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents-State|
CRM-M-50074-of 2017
After hearing counsel for the parties, without commenting uponthe validity/legality of the marriage or the age of the petitioners and keepingin view the binding precedent of the Hon'ble Apex Court in.Lata SinghVv.State of U.P. And another; 2006 (2) SCC (Criminal) 478, the presentpetition is disposed of with direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to look intothe above said representation filed by the petitioners and take appropriateaction in accordance with law and provide protection, if so required.
28.12.7017rajeevWhether speaking/reasonedWhether reportable (G.S. SANDHAWALIA)JUDGE
Yes/NoYes/No