Himachal Pradesh High Court

FAO/126/1995 of H.R.T.C. Vs TARA DEVI on 31 December 2001

Tara Devi & Ors. CMPs No. 19613 & 19614/2023 in FAO No. 126/1995 05.01.2024 Present: Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Vanshaj Azad, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate, for applicants/respondents No. 2 to 4. CMP No. 19613/2023 No reply to the

HRTCVs. Tara Devi & Ors.

CMPs No. 19613 &

19614/2023 in FAO No. 126/1995

05.01.2024 Present:

Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.

Mr. Vanshaj Azad, Advocate, vice Mr. RajulChauhan,Advocate,forapplicants/respondents No. 2 to 4.

CMP No. 19613/2023

No reply to the application is intended to befiled on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant.

Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2 to 4, Kaushalya Devi, Sanjeev Kumar and Ajay Thakur, have attained the age of majority, as is evident from theirMatriculation certificates annexed with the application, thesame is allowed, their guardianship is discharged and theyare allowed to pursue their case in their own capacity.

The application stands disposed of.

CMP No. 19614/2023

The present application under Section 151 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure has been maintained byapplicants/respondents No. 2 to 4, Kaushalya Devi,Sanjeev Kumar and Ajay Thakur, for release of thecompensation amount, lying deposited in the Registry ofthis Court.

As per the applicants, they need the amount tomeet out their day to day expenses. The application is dulysupported with the affidavits of all the applicants.

Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellanthas no objection if compensation amount is released infavour of the applicants, as the award has attained finalityand no appeal has been filed against judgment dated31.12.2001, passed by this Court, in FAO No. 126 of 1995.

Page 1 of 2

Heard. Having perused the averments made inthe application, coupled with the fact that the award hasattained finality, the application is allowed and thecompensation amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lyingdeposited in the Registry of this Court, is ordered to bereleased in favour of applicants/respondents No. 2 to 4,Kaushalya Devi, Sanjeev Kumar and Ajay Thakur, as pertheir respective shares, by remitting the same in theirsavings bank accounts, after due verification, detailswhereof has been given in para-7 of the application.

The application stands disposed of.

5[th] January, 2024(raman)

( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead