Himachal Pradesh High Court
FAO/160/2017 of KULDEEP DOGRA Vs RAMESH KUMAR RAMKRISHAN SHARMA on 31 December 2018
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. FAO (MVA) No.160 of 2017. Date of decision: 31.12.2018. Kuldeep Dogra …..Appellant. Versus Ramesh Kumar Ram Krishan Sharma and others ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
FAO (MVA) No.160 of 2017.
Date of decision: 31.12.2018.
Kuldeep Dogra
…..Appellant.
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Ram Krishan Sharmaand others
….Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1] No
For the Appellant :Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate.
For the Respondents :
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma,Senior Advocate with Mr.Ishant Sharma, Advocate,for respondent No.2.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant despite passageof 14 months and despite the fact that the matter has beenlisted 7 times before the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), AdditionalRegistrar (Judicial) and District & Sessions Judge 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?Yes (Leave/Training Reserve), has failed to take steps for theservice of respondents No.1 and 3. As a matter of fact, noone has even cared to appear before the concernedRegistrars even once when the case was listed before them. 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Pending application, if any, also stands disposedof.
31[st] December, 2018. (krt)
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge