Himachal Pradesh High Court
LPA/580/2012 of RAJNI SHARMA Vs STATE OF HP on 30 December 2013
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA LPA No. 580 of 2012. Date of decision: 30.12.2013 Smt. Rajni …..Appellant Versus State of HP and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, J. Whether approved for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
LPA No. 580 of 2012.
Date of decision: 30.12.2013
Smt. Rajni
Versus State of HP and others
…..Appellant
…Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, J.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
For the appellant:Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. J. K Verma Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4. Nemo for respondent No. 5.
_______________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ (Oral)
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order dated 31[st] July, 2012, passed by the Writ Court in CWP No.5226 of 2011 titled as Smt. Rajni Sharma versus State of H.P. and others, on the grounds taken in the memo of appeal. 2. After hearing for a while, learned counsel for the appellant prayed that he be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy at an appropriate stage. The statement is taken on record. Mr. Anup Rattan, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents has 1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
no objection to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant. His statement is also taken on record.
3. In the given circumstances, the LPA is disposed of by providing that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. The impugned order shall not come in her way. Pending applications, if any also stand disposed of.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Acting Chief Justice.
December 30, 2013, (cmt/krt)
(Kuldip Singh) Judge.