Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/988/1999 of BHULSINGH GHEMSINGH SOLANKI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 10 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 988 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 988 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- BHULSINGH GHEMSINGH SOLANKIVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: THROUGH JAIL for Petitioner MS SIDHDHI TALATI, APP for Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 10/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Perused the Special Criminal Application, reply thereto and heard the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner prayed for parole leave for a period of 30 days for repairing of his house. I fail to see how far it is justified for the petitioner to apply for parole leave on this ground. If he is in need to repair his house, it can be got done through some other member of his family. It appears to be only a pretext to get out from the prison. In case on such ground the parole leave is granted, it will be a tool in the hand of the prisoner to get him out from the jail. It is not the purpose and object of the parole leave.
In the result, this Special Criminal Application fails and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged.
�����(S.K.Keshote,J.)
(pathan)