Gujarat High Court
SCA/8279/1999 of TALAKSHIBHAI NANJI MARU Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 17 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8279 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8279 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- TALAKSHIBHAI NANJI MARU
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR HR PRAJAPATI for Petitioner
MR. H.H. PATEL, AGP for Respondent No. 1
MS PJ DAVAWALA for Respondent No. 4
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
Date of decision: 17/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, by virtue of an order passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmedabad on 9.8.1999.
When the matter came up for hearing it has been stated at the Bar by Mr. H.H. Patel, learned A.G.P. for the respondent No. 1 that the State Government has revoked the order on the advice of the Advisory Board on November 11, 1999.
In this view of the matter, Mr. Prajapati, learned advocate for the petitioner, does not press this petition as having become infructuous. The matter stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs.
�����(A.L. DAVE, J)
[pkn]