Gujarat High Court
SCA/2189/1995 of MANAGER Vs PRESIDING OFFICER on 17 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2189 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2189 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/-
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any OrderJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
Nos. 1 to 5 NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- MANAGER
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR PR NANAVATI for Petitioner
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
MR RV DESAI for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 17/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Learned Counsel for the petitioner produces a copy of the letter addressed by Joint Secretary and Chief Executive Kothari, Vadtal Temple, instructing him to withdraw the petition. He therefore seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. No order as to costs.
���------