Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/10384/2011 of HEM RAM Vs HP HOUSING BOARD on 31 December 2014
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.10384 of 2011-I Date of Decision: 31.12.2014 Hem Ram …Petitioner. Versus H.P. Housing Board & others ..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. For the Petitioner: Mr.Neel Kamal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.10384 of 2011-I
Date of Decision: 31.12.2014
…Petitioner.
Hem Ram
Versus
H.P. Housing Board & others ..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]No.
For the Petitioner: Mr.Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that petitioner shall approach the respondents clearly bringing out the circumstances under which his case is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in CWP No.448 of 2005,titled as H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority Versus Nisha Sharma & others, on 24.07.2008.
2. No other point is urged.
3. Leaving the questions of law open, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondents, within a 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
period of two weeks from today. On receipt of such request by the appropriate authority, the same shall be considered on its merits, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks, by affording adequate opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner. Needless to add, the authorities shall pass a reasoned order, which shall be communicated to all concerned, including the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
December 31, 2014 (Purohit)
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.