Gujarat High Court

ARBI.P/10/1998 of JAYESH TRADING CORPORATION Vs UNION OF INDIA WESTERN RAILWAY on 17 December 1999

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD PETN,UNDER ARBITRATION ACT. No 10 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

PETN,UNDER ARBITRATION ACT. No 10 of 1998

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO

of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO

of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

-------------------------------------------------------------- JAYESH TRADING CORPORATION

Versus

UNION OF INDIA WESTERN RAILWAY

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR SANDEEP N BHATT for Petitioner SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1

MR JC SHETH for Respondent No. 2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR. C.K.THAKKAR

Date of decision: 17/12/1999

ORAL JUDGEMENT

On November 5, 1999, I had passed the following order:

" On November 13, 1998, Honourable Chief Justice passed an order operative part of which reads as under:

`Having heard the counsel on either side, the matter can be referred to the arbitrator. The matter is adjourned for further steps'.

Today, both the learned counsel stated that arbitrator to be named by the General Manager of Western Railway may be appointed. It is,therefore, directed that General Manager , Western Railway may name one arbitrator. Final order will be passed within two weeks of receipt of the writ."

In view of the above order, nothing is required to be done in the matter and the petition must be treated to have been disposed of. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of . No costs.

--

parekh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead