Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/1072/1999 of VINODRAI BHOLASHANKER JOSHI Vs GITABEN W/O GIRISHCHANDRA on 15 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1072 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1072 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- VINODRAI BHOLASHANKER JOSHI
Versus
GITABEN W/O GIRISHCHANDRA
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR KJ SHETHNA for Petitioners MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1 MR. K.P. RAVAL for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA
Date of decision: 15/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. Rule, learned advocate Mr.B.S.Patel waives for respondent no.1. Learned A.P.P. Mr.K.P.Raval waives for the respondent no.2
#. Heard learned advocate Mr.K.J.Sethna for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.B.S.Patel for respondent no.1 and learned A.P.P. for the respondent no.2. Learned advocate Mr.B.S.Patel has made the statement that the parties i.e. the present petitioners and respondent no.1 have compromised and other matters pending between the parties are likely to be settled amicably. In this view of the matter, Mr.B.S.Patel further makes the statement that the respondent no.1 has no objection for quashing of the complaint and his statement is recorded.
#. In this view of the matter, Criminal Case No.664/99 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amod, District Bharuch, filed by present respondent no.1 against the present petitioner under Secs.323, 352, 504 and 114 of the I.P.C. is ordered to be quashed. Whole proceeding taken in pursuance of the above said Criminal Case No.664/99 stands quashed.
#. Petition to that extent is allowed and rule is made absolute.
kks