Gujarat High Court
SCA/4344/1982 of STATE OF GUJARAT Vs JORAVARSINHJI HINDUSINHJI on 4 December 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4344 of 1982 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4344 of 1982
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF GUJARATVersus JORAVARSINHJI HINDUSINHJI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SAMIR DAVE for Petitioner MR BG PATEL for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 04/12/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Shri Samir Dave makes a statement before this court that the papers of this case have not been made available to him nor he has any instructions in the matter. It is really a sorry state of affairs that the State has not made available the papers of this case to its counsel nor has given any instructions.
This matter has been adjourned from time to time on the request of the counsel for the petitioner. Despite of the fact that sufficient long time is granted, the petitioner's counsel has no instructions in this case. In view of this fact, this Special Civil Application is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule discharged.
It is a case where the respondent has been dragged into litigation by none other than a welfare state. The respondent has faced agony of the pendency of this writ petition for all these years. Not only this, the matter has been adjourned from time to time on the request of counsel for the petitioner. In view of this fact, it is a fit case where the respondent should be compensated with costs of the litigation. Order accordingly. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs.1000/- to the respondent by way of costs of this petition.
*********
zgs/-