Himachal Pradesh High Court

WRIT PETITION 10225 of 2008 on 31 December 2010

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP(T)No.10225 of 2008.

Kavita Sood

Date of decision: 31.12.2010

…. Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P & ors.

Coram:

.... Respondents

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J.

Whether approved for reporting ? No

For the petitioner: Mr.Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate.

For the respondents: Sh.Ramesh Thakur, Dy.Advocate General.

Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral)

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that her salary for the months of December, 2002, January, 2003 and February, 2003 be released in her favour.

2. The stand of the State is that the petitioner was transferred and was to replace one Sh.Suresh Awasthy who managed to obtain a stay order in Original Application No.3162 of 2002 and as a sequel to this, the petitioner was rendered surplus in the school, in question. Therefore, the salary of the petitioner was not released.

3. I fail to understand why the petitioner should suffer in case Sh.Suresh Awasthy obtained a stay order. Clarification, if any, should have been obtained from the Tribunal by the State in the Original Application filed by Sh.Suresh Awasthy. The petitioner could not be made to suffer and could not be denied salary for the period when she served in a school as per the orders of the State itself. It is not that the petitioner violated any orders of the State. Therefore, the petition is allowed.

4. The respondents are directed to release the salary of the petitioner for the aforesaid period, if not already paid to her, on or before 30[th] April, 2011 alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date the salary fell due till the date of payment of the same. In case the payment is not made by 30[th] April, 2011 then the State shall be liable to pay interest @ 12% per annum.

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

December 31, 2010 (m)

( Deepak Gupta ) Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead