Himachal Pradesh High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 9612 of 2013 on 31 December 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 9612 of 2013B
Date of Decision: 31.12.2013
Sh.Dev Raj.
………Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & Others
…..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Bisht, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
We have called for the record of the transfer of the petitioner. It appears that transfer of the petitioner has been effected on the basis of D.O. note. Record produced, perused and returned.
2. In these circumstances, we find that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of this court in CWP No.801 of 2013 titled as Sanjay Kumar versus State of HP & others, alongwith connected matters, decided on 5.7.2013. We accordingly quash and set aside transfer order dated 06.12.2013 (Annexure P-1), so far it effects the transfer of the petitioner. We leave it open to the respondents 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
to transfer the petitioner in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of.
All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of.
Copy dasti.
( Sanjay Karol), Judge.
December 31, 2013.
(Purohit)
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge.