Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/3784/2019 of ARUN KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2019
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3784 of 2019 Decided on: 31.12.2019 Arun Kumar .......Petitioner Versus State of H.P and another …...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. Whether
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3784 of 2019
Decided on: 31.12.2019
Arun Kumar .......Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P and another
…...Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, JudgeThe Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Addl. A.Gwith Mr. Narinder Guleria, Addl.A.G, Mr. J.S. Guleria, Dy. A.G andMr. Raju Ram Rahi, Dy. A.G.Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Consequent upon the order passed on the previous date,learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record the writteninstructions. Annexed thereto is the office order dated 18.12.2019,whereby the petitioner has now been adjusted against the leavevacancy in Government High School, Gharna, District Kangra, H.P.Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has even joined duties atthe transferred station. The writ petition is, therefore, not pressed andthe same is accordingly disposed of as not pressed, so also thepending application(s), if any.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary)
Judge
December 31, 2019
(Anoop Chitkara) Judge
(naveen)
1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.