Himachal Pradesh High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 3148 of 2012 on 31 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Civil Revision No. 211/2004 Decided on 31.12.2014
______________________________________________________________________
R.K. Sood
…. Petitioner
Versus
Dr. YS Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, Nauni and another…. Respondents ______________________________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? [1]
For the petitioner : Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Parmod Negi, Advocate, for the For the respondents : Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate.
______________________________________________________________________
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
The only core issue involved in the present petition is whether interest would accrue on interest or not? This issue is no more res integra in view of the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3148 of 2012 titled M/sHyder Consulting (UK) Ltd. vs. Governor State of Orissa through Chief Engineer decided on 25.11.2014.
2. Consequently, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay interest amount to `23,000/- as calculated by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from today. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
December 31, 2014 (vikrant)
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?