Gujarat High Court
CRA/1451/1986 of DHURIBEN ASHARAM PACHHIYAPURAWALA Vs KHUSHVADAN C BHATT on 20 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1451 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1451 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- DHURIBEN ASHARAM PACHHIYAPURAWALAVersus KHUSHVADAN C BHATT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioners None present for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 20/11/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Though in view of this Court's order dated 30.1.88, by now the suit would have been disposed of, the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to inform this Court affirmatively whether the suit has been disposed of or not.
2. Interest of justice will be served in case this revision application is disposed of in terms that the interim relief which has been granted by this Court on 14.11.86 and confirmed on 30.1.88 shall continue till the suit is disposed of finally. The learned trial Court shall dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of writ of this order, in case it has not so far been disposed of. In case the suit has already been disposed of, this order need not be complied with and the interim relief which is ordered to be continued shall stand automatically vacated and this revision application shall stand dismissed as having become infructuous.
.......
(sunil)