Himachal Pradesh High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 9673 of 2013 on 31 December 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.9673 of 2013
Date of decision: 31.12.2013
Geetika Thakur …. Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. and others …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.
For the Petitioner :Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate. For the Respondents :Mr. R.M. Bisht, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General.
Sanjay Karol, Judge(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, does not press the present petition and submits that petitioner shall approach the respondents clearly bringing out the circumstances under which her case is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in CWP No.4954/2012, titled as Madan Lal and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, alongwith connected matters, on 7.11.2012.
2. No other point is urged.
3. Leaving the questions of law open, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondents, as prayed for. As and when any such request is received by the appropriate authority, the same shall be considered on its merits, in accordance with law, also keeping in view the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in Jai Dev Gupta versus State of Himachal Pradesh, AIR 1998 SC 2819, within a period of eight weeks, by affording adequate opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the petitioner, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of as not pressed, so also, pending application(s), if any.
(Sanjay Karol ),
Judge.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge.
December 31, 2013(KS)