Gujarat High Court
AO/381/1992 of MONARK FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD on 17 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 381 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 381 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- MONARK FOODS PRIVATE LIMITEDVersus GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JR NANAVATI for Appellant MR RC JANI for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 17/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. As a result of the hearing and discussion, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel on the basis of which, it is directed as under.
(A) The trial court shall hear and dispose off the pending suit namely Special Civil Suit No. 45 of 1992 as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 30th June, 1999.
(B) It is clarified and directed that until the said suit is disposed off, the interim orders passed in the present appeal shall continue to operate.
3. In view of the aforesaid directions, learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal for any further relief and the same is accordingly disposed off.
5. The Registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 23rd December,
1998. Direct service is also permitted.
********
pirzada/-