Gujarat High Court
SCA/1738/1994 of DALPATBHAI RAMUBHAI Vs GANDABHAI ZINABHAI on 27 November 2002
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1738 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1738 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DALPATBHAI RAMUBHAIVersus GANDABHAI ZINABHAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1738 of 1994 MR PV HATHI for Petitioner No. 1 .......... for Petitioner No. 2-8 MR RN SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
Date of decision: 27/11/2002
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard learned advocate Mr. P.V. Hathi for the petitioners and Mr. Dhirendra K. Mehta for the respondents. Learned advocate Mr. P.V. Hathi has submitted that as agreed between the parties out side the Court, present petitioners seek leave to withdraw the present petition and the petition may be disposed of finally. In view of the request made by the learned advocate Mr. P.V. Hathi on behalf of the petitioners, leave to withdraw this petition is granted. This petition is disposed off as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated forthwith with no order as to costs.
Dt.27.11.2002. ����(H.K.Rathod,J.)
Vyas