Gujarat High Court
CRA/1068/1999 of DHANJIBHAI KHODABHAI KANGAD Vs SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED on 8 November 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1068 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1068 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- DHANJIBHAI KHODABHAI KANGAD
Versus
SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR HARESH H PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR DM THAKKAR for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 08/11/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Shri Ashish M. Dagli, who appears for Shri H.H.
Patel, states, on instructions from the petitioner, that the dispute has been settled between the parties out of court and seeks leave to withdraw the revision application. Leave granted. The revision application is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to produce the letter received from the petitioner.
���******* hki��