Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/985/2022 of CHARANDEEP SINGH JOLLY Vs CB HEALTHCARE on 30 December 2022
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 985 of 2022. Decided on : 30 th December, 2022. Charandeep Singh Jolly ...Petitioner. Versus C.B. Healthcare ....Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anoop Verma
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 985 of 2022.
Decided on : 30th December, 2022.
Charandeep Singh Jolly
...Petitioner.
Versus
C.B. Healthcare
....Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anoop Verma and Mr. RajeshKumar Parmar, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Nemo.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that hemay be permitted to withdraw this petition at this stage as byinadvertence composite petition has been filed assailingmore than one order passed in different complaints. Hesubmits that he will be filing separate petitions assailing thesaid orders. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the instantpetition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file separatepetitions, if so advised. It is, however, clarified that the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner by way of this ordershall not be construed to have expression of any opinion onthe merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
30[th] December, 2022.(jai)
(Satyen Vaidya)Judge