Gujarat High Court
SCA/1281/1988 of KANDLA PORT TRUST RETIRED AND PENISONER'S ASSOCIATION Vs BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KANDLA on 17 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1281 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1281 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANDLA PORT TRUST RETIRED AND PENISONER'S ASSOCIATIONVersus BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KANDLA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MR ANAND for Petitioner M/S NJ MEHTA ASSO. for Respondent No. 1 MR BB NAIK for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT Date of decision: 17/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
When the matter was called out last time, as well as today, it was pointed that some of the Office bearers have intimated the learned advocate for the petitioners that the resolution has been passed, not to persue this petition, and therefore, it is required to be disposed of. However, the learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that, a copy of the resolution is not received despite intimation to the petitioner-Association.
Since the matter is of 1988 and it may happen that the Association after having taken such decision,it might not thought it fit to inform, confirm or send a copy of resolution, which would not act as an impediment in the disposal of the matter, which has been rendered infructuous.
In the circumstances, it is disposed of having become infructuous.
In case of difficulty, liberty is reserved.
Rule discharged.
����( J.N.BHATT, J )
patil/-