Himachal Pradesh High Court
CR.R/177/2002 of JAI RAM Vs BHUWAN CHAND on 31 December 2008
of 2002. 31.12.2008. Present: Mr.T.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.N.K. Thakur, counsel for respondent No.1. Ms.Shubh Mahajan, Dy.A.G., for respondent No.2. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the vehicle in question has been taken by the Financer. In view of the above
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
31.12.2008. Present: Mr.T.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.N.K. Thakur, counsel for respondent No.1. Ms.Shubh Mahajan, Dy.A.G., for respondent No.2.
Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the vehicle in question has been taken by the Financer.
In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for both the parties and the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner recorded separately that he does not press the petition, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous.
December 31, 2008.(TILAK)
(V.K. Ahuja), Judge.