Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44321/2013 of SALVINDER KAUR AND ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 31 December 2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-44321 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2013 Salvinder Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in
Crl.M.No.M-44321 of 2013(O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
Salvinder Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Crl.M.No.M-44321 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2013
.....Petitioners
v.
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Petitioners in person withMr.D.S.Kahlon, Advocate.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is forissuance of direction to respondent nos.2 to 4 to protect the life and libertyof the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.5 and 6.Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitionerswill be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police,District Gurdaspur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance withlaw, on application, dated 28.12.2013, Annexure P5, already made to himby the petitioners.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Salvinder Kaur, as per copy ofMatriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 5.8.1988, and dateof birth of petitioner No.2-Ajay Kumar, as per copy of MatriculationExamination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 2.4.1988. They got married on27.12.2013, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of themarriage are Annexure P4.
Page 1 of 2
In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for thepetitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2,i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, District Gurdaspur, to take appropriateaction, in accordance with law, on application, dated 28.12.2013, Annexure Crl.M.No.M-44321 of 2013(O&M)
P5, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having noeffect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on anyother civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as perlaw.
31.12.2013meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…