Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44263/2013 of RAVNEET KAUR &ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. on 30 December 2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-44263 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 30, 2013 Ravneet Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Crl.M.No.M-44263 of 2013(O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-44263 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 30, 2013
Ravneet Kaur and another
v.
.....Petitioners
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Petitioners in person withMr.R.K.Arya, Advocate andMr.S.S.Kainth, Advocate Mr.H.S.Bath, Advocatefor the private respondents.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is forissuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and libertyof the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 8.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitionerswill be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police,District Muktsar, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance withlaw, on application, dated 24.12.2013, Annexure P5, already made to himby the petitioners.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Ravneet Kaur, as per copy ofMatriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 14.9.1994, and dateof birth of petitioner No.2-Narinder Singh, as per copy of MatriculationExamination Certificate Annexure P2, is 24.7.1991. They got married on24.12.2013 as per marriage certificate, Annexure P4. Photographs of themarriage are Annexure P3.
In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the Crl.M.No.M-44263 of 2013(O&M)
petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2,i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, District Muktsar, to take appropriateaction, in accordance with law, on application, dated 24.12.2013, AnnexureP5, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having noeffect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on anyother civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as perlaw.
30.12.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta)Judge