CRM-M/36491/2009 of A.A. ROBERTS AND ORS. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. on 24 December 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.M-36491 of 2009Date of decision:24.12.2009.

A.A.Roberts and others

...Petitioners

State of Punjab and another

Versus

…Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND.

Present:Mr. Promial Nain, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate, for respondent No.2. *****

S.D.ANAND, J.

The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners andrespondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed onrecord documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2.Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and areidentified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding.They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting betweenthem. Their joint statement is also recorded separately.

In the larger interest of the society and to enable theparties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed andFIR No.175 dated 30.11.2000, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471,477A IPC, P.S. Sahnewal, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) shall standquashed on account of compounding.

December 24, 2009

vinod*

(S.D.ANAND) JUDGE