Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/298/2007 of SANDHYA DEVI Vs GRAM PANCHAYAT DHRAMSHALA. on 28 December 2007
of 2007. 28.12.2007. Present: Mr. A.K. Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner. After hearing Mr. Anoop Rattan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on going through the impugned judgment, I find that both the Courts below have rightly rejected the petitioner’s application
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
CMPMO No.298 of 2007.
28.12.2007. Present: Mr. A.K. Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
After hearing Mr. Anoop Rattan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on going through the impugned judgment, I find that both the Courts below have rightly rejected the petitioner’s application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC because the petitioner had failed to establish a prima facie case in her favour. No interference is called for. The petition is dismissed in limine.
CMP No.1090 of 2007.
In view of the dismissal of the main petition, this application is also dismissed.
28[th] December, 2007. (tr)
(V.K. Gupta), C.J.