Himachal Pradesh High Court
WRIT PETITION 1180 of 2012 on 31 December 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1180 of 2012-HDecided on 31.12.2012
________________________________________________________
Shri Hukum Chand son of Sh.Tulsi Ram, resident of Village Kushma, Post Office Saletar, Tehsil and Distt. Mandi, H.P. Constable Driver Central Industrial Security Force.
.......Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary (Home) Central Secretariat, New Delhi. Secretariat, New Delhi.
2. The Director General, North Zone, Indistrial Security Force, Saket, New Delhi. Saket, New Delhi.
3. The Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, RTC Bhillai. Bhillai.
.......Respondents
Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 ofConstitution of India ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate.
__________________________________________ _________________
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
Para-6 of the reply filed by the respondents reads thus:
Page 1 of 2
“That however, Govt. of India have formulated a new policy guidelines for considering the appointment of candidates with criminal back grounds in CAPF vide MHA UO No. 45020/2010-PERS.II Dated 1.2.2012. According to the said guidelines CISR HQrs New Delhi have constituted a committee to examine all such cases for considering appointments of candidates with criminal backgrounds. Accordingly, the case of the petitioner has been sent to the said committee at TS HQrs NISA Hyderabad vide RTC Bhillai Letter No. E-37013/RTC (BH)/TRG/MISC/RTU/12-418 Dated 7.3.2012 and Letter of even No. (970) Dated 26.6.2012 ANNEXURE R-1 for further examination in the light of Govt. of India policy guidelines under reference, which is awaited.
2. The committee is directed to take a final decision within a period of three months from today and convey the same to the petitioner.
3. With these observations, the present writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.
December 31, 2012( Kalpana)
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…