Himachal Pradesh High Court

WRIT PETITION 1180 of 2012 on 31 December 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

CWP No. 1180 of 2012-HDecided on 31.12.2012

________________________________________________________

Shri Hukum Chand son of Sh.Tulsi Ram, resident of Village Kushma, Post Office Saletar, Tehsil and Distt. Mandi, H.P. Constable Driver Central Industrial Security Force.

.......Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary (Home) Central Secretariat, New Delhi. Secretariat, New Delhi.

2. The Director General, North Zone, Indistrial Security Force, Saket, New Delhi. Saket, New Delhi.

3. The Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, RTC Bhillai. Bhillai.

.......Respondents

Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 ofConstitution of India ________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?

_________________________________________________________

For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.

For the Respondents : Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate.

__________________________________________ _________________

Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):

Para-6 of the reply filed by the respondents reads thus:

Page 1 of 2

“That however, Govt. of India have formulated a new policy guidelines for considering the appointment of candidates with criminal back grounds in CAPF vide MHA UO No. 45020/2010-PERS.II Dated 1.2.2012. According to the said guidelines CISR HQrs New Delhi have constituted a committee to examine all such cases for considering appointments of candidates with criminal backgrounds. Accordingly, the case of the petitioner has been sent to the said committee at TS HQrs NISA Hyderabad vide RTC Bhillai Letter No. E-37013/RTC (BH)/TRG/MISC/RTU/12-418 Dated 7.3.2012 and Letter of even No. (970) Dated 26.6.2012 ANNEXURE R-1 for further examination in the light of Govt. of India policy guidelines under reference, which is awaited.

2. The committee is directed to take a final decision within a period of three months from today and convey the same to the petitioner.

3. With these observations, the present writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.

December 31, 2012( Kalpana)

(Rajiv Sharma), Judge

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead