Himachal Pradesh High Court
REVIEW PETITION 6866 of 2014 on 31 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 6866 of 2014
Decided on: 31.12.2014
Nikku Ram.
….Petitioner
versus
….Respondents.
State of H.P. & others.
___________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting or not?[1] No For the petitioner: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikram Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Judge(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the authority below failed to appreciate the fact that neither the complainant entered into the witness box nor was the demarcation report placed on record. As such, petitioner proposes to file a review application before the Divisional Commissioner. Permission granted. Petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court, if need so arises. 2. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol) Judge
31[st] December, 2014 (P.S. Rana) (kck)
1Whether local reporters of the newspapers are allowed to see the judgment?