Gujarat High Court
LPA/265/1985 of V X L INDIA LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 12 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 265 of 1985 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2753 OF 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH ============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 265 of 1985
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2753 OF 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and
MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH
============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- V X L INDIA LTDVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR SB VAKIL for Appellant
MR BY MANKAD, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1, 2 AND 3
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and �� MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH
Date of decision: 12/11/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per Patel, J.)
It is pointed out that Special Civil Application No. 1943 of 1985, the interlocutory order of which was challenged in this L.P.A, has been finally disposed of by learned Single Judge on 24.10.1996. Under the circumstances, learned advocate Mr. Vakil and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Mankad state that this appeal has become infructuous. Hence this appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
The appeal having been disposed of as infructuous, Civil Application No. 2753/85 does not survive. Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated.
infructuous, Civil Application No. 2753/85 does not No order of costs in both these matters.