Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/5104/2011 of AMRIK SINGH Vs HP POWER CORPORATION LTD. on 30 December 2016
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5104 of 2011a/w CWP Nos. 5113, 5114 and 5420 of 2011 Date of Decision: 30.12.2016 ______________________________[_________________________ 1. CWP No. 5104 of 2011 Amrik Singh and Ors. …...Petitioners. Versus HPPCL and Ors ...Respondents 2. CWP No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 5104 of 2011a/w CWP
Nos. 5113, 5114 and 5420 of 2011 Date of Decision: 30.12.2016
______________________________[_________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 5104 of 2011Amrik Singh and Ors. …...Petitioners. Versus HPPCL and Ors ...Respondents 2.CWP No. 5113 of 2011Hoshiar Singh and Anr. …...Petitioners. Versus HPPCL and Ors ...Respondents 3.CWP No. 5114 of 2011Jiwa Ram and Ors. …...Petitioners. Versus HPPCL and Ors ...Respondents 4.CWP No. 5420 of 2011Parjesh Kumar and Anr. …...Petitioners. Versus HPPCL and Ors. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting[1]? For the petitioners: Mr. Anil Thakur, Proxy Counsel. For the respondents: Mr. Nitish Negi, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?
Mr. P.M. Negi, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State.
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly stated that the instant cases being service matter are required to be transferred to the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Shimla, HP.
2. Accordingly, in view of the notification No. G.S.R.926 (E) dated 29.12.2014 and No. Per (AP-B)B(15)4/2015 dated 25.3.2015, the matter requires to be adjudicated under the provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. As such, in view of Section 29 of the said Act, record be transmitted to the Registry of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, which now stands established.
3. Learned counsel for the parties undertake to communicate the order to their clients and appear before the Tribunal on 10.1.2017.
4. Registrar (Judicial) to take appropriate action.
30[th] December, 2016 manjit
( Sandeep Sharma ), Judge.