CRM-M/44350/2013 of MANJEET KAUR AND ANR Vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS on 31 December 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No. M- 44350 of 2013(O&M)

Date of Decision: December 31, 2013.

Manjeet Kaur and another

...... PETITIONER(s)

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh and others

...... RESPONDENT (s)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

Present:Petitioners in person with Mr. K.S.Lakhanpal,Advocate, for the petitioners.

*****

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners willbe satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh i.e. respondentNo.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law onapplication dated 30.12.2013 (Annexure P-4), made to him by petitioner no.1.

As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner No.1 -Manjeet Kaur, as per copy of IdentityCard issued by Election Commission of India, Annexure P-1, is 18.05.1986and date of birth of petitioner No.2 –Vijay Sharma as per copy of birthcertificate, Annexure P-2, is 02.09.1987. They got married on 30.12.2013 as per averments made in the petition. Photographs of the marriage are AnnexureP-3.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for thepetitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction torespondent No.2 - i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh to takeappropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 30.12.2013(Annexure P-4) as already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1.

However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effecton the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil orcriminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.

December 31, 2013.‘om’

( RAM CHAND GUPTA )JUDGE