Himachal Pradesh High Court
LPA/4082/2013 of STATE OF HP Vs GOPAL SINGH on 31 December 2013
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA LPA No. 4082 of 2013. Date of decision: 31.12.2013 State of H.P. and others …..Appellants Versus Gopal Singh …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, J. Whether approved
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
LPA No. 4082 of 2013.
Date of decision: 31.12.2013
State of H.P. and others
…..Appellants
Gopal Singh
Versus
…Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ.The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, J.
Whether approved for reporting ?[1]
For the appellants:Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J. K Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
For the respondent:
Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate.
_______________________________________________________
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, ACJ (Oral)
CMP(M) No. 11988/2013.
The appellants/applicants have filed this application seeking condonation of 269 days delay which has crept-in in filing the appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner stated at the Bar that he has no objection in case; the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The statement is taken on record. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. yes LPA No. 4082 of 2013.
3. The LPA is taken on Board.
4. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.12.2012, passed in CWP No.8380 of 2010. The learned counsel appearing for the parties stated at the Bar that the identical LPA, arising out of the same judgment, has already been decided by this Court on 4.9.2013 and prayed that the present LPA be decided in terms of that judgment. The statement is taken on record. Mr. Romesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate has also produced photocopy of the judgment passed in LPA No. 4034 of 2013 with LPA No. 118 of 2013, made part of the file.
5. In view of the statements of the learned counsel for the parties, we deem it proper to dispose of the present LPA in terms of judgment passed on 4.9.2013 in LPA No. 4034 of 2013 read with LPA No. 118 of 2013. The judgment passed in the said LPAs is made part of this judgment. Accordingly, the LPA is disposed of, as also the pending applications, if any.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Acting Chief Justice.
December 31, 2013,
(cmt/krt)
(Kuldip Singh)
Judge.