Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/6398/2020 of MAHATAM CHAND Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 31 December 2020
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.6398 of 2020 Decided on : 31.12.2020 Mahatam Chand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents ___________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.6398 of 2020
Decided on : 31.12.2020
Mahatam Chand
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and another
…Respondents
___________________________________________
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
________________________________________________
For the petitioner :
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Dy. A.G. (through video conferencing)
For the respondents :
Sureshwar Thakur, Judge (oral)
The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent concerned to decide the representation, of, the petitioner, Annexure P-2, in accordance with law, within four weeks, and, after affording an opportunity of hearing to him. It is made clear that till the representation of the petitioner, is, decided by the competent authority, thereupto the station(s), mentioned in the apposite representation, shall be kept vacant. Also, the pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.
Copy dasti.
(Sureshwar Thakur) Judge
December 31, 2020 Kalpana
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge