Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/1699/2001 of MOHD.HASHIM Vs M.D.,M.P.S.R.T.C. and ORS. on 10 December 2001
{43' V ’ v c , TN. THE HIGH COUR‘I,‘ OF CH® DGARH AT BI'LASPUR' ii/‘C‘D' \ 1‘ WRIT yyg‘'r :1“ ION No. M99 OF 2001 PETZCTIONER :f iohd. Hashim, son of Mohd. Hanif, aged " ' ¥ 59 years, Retired sBcoking Kge‘nt, Opposite»
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
XI—HC-zz
/Ww\..................................... fmJW‘i[m;]200nno.co:u‘1”...u~nnn~un...,.'.............................................................W’‘mar. www§wmmmmmmw$[am]mWW10/12/2001:—Pe‘l'i‘rioner- by Shri P SKoshy, Advoca‘reResponden‘r by Shrl Dhnrendm MishmAdvoca‘reHeard‘ri‘rionThe has refir'ed'fr'om serviceHe peh‘rloner‘in This p'rois yefreceivehisreiiralbenef TsDue+0nonrecelp‘r ofre‘hmlMbenefitsThepe’h'honer'[and]his de endanfs arefucmggrea'rfinancmlhardshipA prayer has been ma efha'l' paymen‘r ofre‘hraibenefrrs¢cunnof be delayed Inasmuch as IT Ise righ‘r of fhe receive pe‘rmoner f0F5such benefifsIf has been sfafedfhe Bar‘fime and again[‘rha-r]if is“ noboun'i'y andIfIsfhedufyofThecompe‘l'enf aufhorify1'0rehraiipaybenefrrsOne and['l'he]only reasonvery hme fha'r is fhisi placed beforeCourf Is Tha‘r +he departmen‘r is facin«H'h‘vfinancml crunch.ShriDhirendra Mishralearnedcounselappearing) forThe[\"C’"]\Deparfmen'l' drawsmyaffenfion1'ThedocumenTdaTed29/08/2001whichis said To be a scheme whichas been evolved by The deparTmenTfor The purpose of paymenT of reTil benefITs To The employees who hassince reTIredThe scheme makeRs 5 000/- To proposes TopaymenT[of]lThe employees of Grade-I and IId Rs.3,000/— To The employees of4'Grade-III and IV per monTh.lilI,Ji.......[new ammqérfgaaa)
+