Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8746/2013 of TIKENDER SINGH PANWAR Vs STATE OF HP on 31 December 2018
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8746 of 2013 Date of Decision: 31.12.2018 _____________________________________________________________________ Tikender Singh Panwar …..Petitioner. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 8746 of 2013Date of Decision: 31.12.2018
_____________________________________________________________________
Tikender Singh Panwar…..Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For petitioner:Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate withMs. Abhilasha Kaundal, Advocate.
For respondents:Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate Generalwith M/s. Ranjan Sharma and Adarsh K.Sharma, Additional Advocate Generalsfor the State.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, forrespondents No.5 and 6.
Surya Kant, Chief Justice(Oral):
Learned counsel for respondents No.5 and 6 states that theHimachal Pradesh Cricket Association has, in conformity with thedirections issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and therecommendations made by Justice Lodha’s Committee, submitted itsConstitution to the Registrar of Companies and BCCI. He submits thatas soon as the said Constitution is registered, it shall also be placedbefore the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In view of the above stand having 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
been taken by respondents No.5 and 6, learned counsel for the partiesstate and rightly so that most of the issues raised in this writ petitionhave been rendered infructuous. As regards the Constitution andComposition of District Association affiliated to H.P. Cricket Association,it is clarified that as soon as the Constitution of the State CricketAssociation is brought in conformity with the directions issued by theHon’ble Supreme Court, the necessary follow up action for Constitution ofthe District Associations, in conformity thereto, may also be taken.
The writ petition stands disposed of in terms terms, so alsopending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Surya Kant) Chief Justice
December 31, 2018 (Guleria/K)
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge