Himachal Pradesh High Court
RFA/329/2019 of THE RENUKA JI DAM PROJECT AND OTHERS Vs GEETA RAM AND OTHERS on 31 December 2021
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No. 329 OF 2019 BETWEEN:- 1. THE RENUKAJI DAM PROJECT THROUGH ITS DGM SHRI P.K. KATHURIA, C/O HPPCL, SUB TEHSIL DADAHU, DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P. 2. THE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ON THE 31[st] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No. 329 OF 2019
BETWEEN:-
1.THE RENUKAJI DAM PROJECT THROUGH ITS DGM SHRI P.K. KATHURIA, C/O HPPCL, SUB TEHSIL DADAHU, DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P.
2. THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, HPPCL, UTTAM BHAWAN, SHIMLA-3, H.P. COLLECTOR, HPPCL, UTTAM BHAWAN, SHIMLA-3, H.P.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SH.VIKAS MISHRA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 GEETA RAM SON OF SHRIJALMU ALIAS JALAM SINGH, AGED 58 YEARS. ALIAS JALAM SINGH, AGED 58 YEARS. 2. RIKHI RAM SON OF SHRI JALMU ALIAS JALAM SINGH, AGED 55 YEARS. ALIAS JALAM SINGH, AGED 55 YEARS.
3. RAM DEVI D/O SHRI JALMU ALIAS JALAM SINGH, AGED 50 YEARS. JALAM SINGH, AGED 50 YEARS.
4. TULA RAM SON OF SHRI JALMU ALIAS JALAM SINGH, DIED AND INHERITED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS:- ALIAS JALAM SINGH, DIED AND INHERITED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS:- i) BALBIR SINGH, AGED 46 YEARS, ii) TIKA RAM, AGED 35 YEARS, ii) KARAM CHAND, AGED 35 YEARS, ii) TIKA RAM, AGED 35 YEARS, ii) KARAM CHAND, AGED 35 YEARS, ALL SONS OF LATE SH. TULA RAM 5. DAULAT RAM SON OF SHRI FISHKU, AGED 55 YEARS, FISHKU, AGED 55 YEARS,
6. AMAR SINGH SON OF SHRI MEHAR SINGH, AGED 52 YEARS, SINGH, AGED 52 YEARS, 7. JASWANT SINGH SON OF SHRI SUNDER SINGH, AGED 44 YEARS. SUNDER SINGH, AGED 44 YEARS.
ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE KALYAN AND UNGAR KANDO, TEHSIL RENUKA JI AT SANGRAH, DISTRICT SIRMOUR, H.P.
….RESPONDENTS
8. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SIRMOUR AT NAHAN, H.P.
…PERFORMA RESPONDENT
(NONE FOR RESPODNENS No. 1 TO 7.)
(SH. RAJU RAM RAHI, DEPUTY ADVOCATE
GENERAL, FOR RESPONDENT NO. 8.)
Whether approved for reporting?
RFA No. 329 of 2019 & CMP No. 1605 of 2021
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants, alongwith CMP No.
1605 of 2021, has placed on record instructions dated 8.11.2021, received from Land Acquisition Collector, HPPCL, Shimla requesting the counsel to withdraw the appeal and, therefore, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
2. As prayed, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, alongwith pending applications.
31[st] December, 2021 (Keshav)
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.