Gujarat High Court
SCA/4356/1995 of KANUBHAI NARBHERAM PADHIYAR Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 1 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4356 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4356 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- KANUBHAI NARBHERAM PADHIYAR
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: No one appears for the petitioner. MR S.A.PANDYA, learned A.G.P. for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA
Date of decision: 01/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Pandya submits that the order has been passed taking petitioner back on duty, but the petitioner himself has not joined.No one has appeared despite repeated calls on behalf of the petitioner to controvert this statement. This petition has, therefore,become infructuous and the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule is hereby discharged. Interim relief stands automatically vacated.No order as to costs.
-0-