SCA/8687/1992 of SHARADKUMAR GIGABHAI MAKWANA Vs AMERLI NAGARPALIKA on 22 December 2000

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SHARADKUMAR GIGABHAI MAKWANAVersus AMERLI NAGARPALIKA

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

MR NS DESAI for Petitioner

MRS KOKILA V ASHAR for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI

— Date of decision: 22/12/2000

ORAL JUDGEMENT

The petition has been filed under an apprehension that the services of the petitioner will be terminated without following the procedure. Ad-interim relief was granted in the petition that the petitioner's services will not be terminated except in accordance with law.

Even when this petition is called out the learned Counsel for the respondent Municipality makes it clear that the services of the petitioner will not be terminated except in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, the apprehension of the petitioner is ill-founded and the petition is premature. The services of the petitioner will not be terminated except in accordance with law. Subject to this direction the petition is rejected. Rule will not be terminated except in accordance with law. Subject to this direction the petition is rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated.

----

*/Mohandas