Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/466/2018 of TITA RAM Vs LEELA DEVI on 31 December 2018
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 466 of 2018 Decided on : 31.12.2018 Tita Ram & others …..Petitioners. Versus Leela Devi ….Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLACMPMO No. 466 of 2018
Decided on : 31.12.2018
Tita Ram & others
…..Petitioners.
Versus
Leela Devi ….Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the petitioners:Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate. For the respondent:
Kanwar Bhupinder Singh, Advocate.
Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral)
Since the relevant Will has already been proven by themarginal witness thereto, hence subsequent thereto endeavor, for,proving the same, is, a mere after thought, and, also a redundantexercise. Consequently, the impugned order is maintained, and,the instant petition is dismissed, as infructuous. All pendingapplications also disposed of.
31[st] December, 2018 (kck)
(Sureshwar Thakur), Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?