Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/111/2007 of PAWAN KUMAR Vs STATE on 28 December 2007
of 2007. 28.12.2007. Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Cr.MP No.653 of 2007. This is an application for placing on record the compromise arrived at between
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Cr.MMO No.111 of 2007.
28.12.2007.
Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Cr.MP No.653 of 2007.
This is an application for placing on record the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No.3 and based upon such compromise to compound the offence for which the petitioner has been charged in the FIR in question which the petitioner has prayed for quashing.
The FIR was registered in terms of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure pursuant to a complaint filed by respondent No.3 against the petitioner in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nalagarh.
The application has been jointly filed and is signed by the petitioner, respondent No.3, as well as the counsel representing both. It is supported by the individual, separate affidavits of the petitioner and respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 is present in person, who has been identified by Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate representing him.
Since the parties have compromised and because the offence is otherwise also compoundable, the petition being Cr.MMO No.111 of 2007 is allowed. The offence is compounded and the FIR as well as pending Criminal complaint both are quashed with all the consequences.
The application and Cr.MMO No.111 of 2007 are disposed of.
Cr.MP No.594/2007 & Cr.MP No.643/2007.
In view of the disposal of the main petition, both the applications are also disposed of.
28[th] December, 2007. (tr)
(V.K. Gupta), C.J.