WP/1868/2001 of ANIL KUMAR MISHRA Vs M.P.STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTH.and ORS. on 16 December 2002

^^-IN THEmGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILXSPURWRITPETITIONNO.-x-^/200l1N'EBEMATTER OF,KUMARMISHRAS/0 Ramheet MishraAged about 3 8yearsR/o Vikas Nagar, 27, KholiBilaspur [C.G.}PETITIONERVERSUSM.P.STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary,574 South CivilLinesJabalpur [M.P.]STATE PF CHHATTISGARH'Jtw'f'Secrgtgriat, Rqipur [C.G.]§e-CS-i&Svt^yAc./?Ar>JlY<uin.fr:(3^-Z^uiL.O'?i-R/!-lAuKM^P-^-ifUJ-L CC-'C^-'STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHThrough Legal Advisory Board(6-Sp&T.(iswJ^~Oyi&en<a Vindhyanchal Bhawan, 2nd FloorJZ-g< 2^f"Lfe-i~-ie^>d-<^--Bhopal [M.P.]"a-aDISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITYThrough its secretaryl/S.^. Z<TOZ_DistrictCourt Bilaspur [C.G.].u^toN^cp-^N'yift. Q^ff X^.-A.IMew ^c^'^i'"^'rf^p.R^^'S^^:^^^The Hon'ble ChiefJustiee and HisCompanion Justices oftfieHon'ble High Court ofChhattisgarh atBilaspur.PETITION UNDER ARTICI^_226/227OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR APPROPRIATEWRIT.ORDERORDIRECTIONANDFORPROTECTION OF FANDAMENTAL RIGHTS ASGRAUNTEED UNDER ARTTGLE 14&.21 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA.<The petitioner above named most respectfallv statedunder: -1. PARTICULARSOF THEPETITIONER*As mentioned in the cause title.f't^:<^:t^,\S:ftS.X^^^>-p-.'

f;!^'vu'~SsffWS i°SSIBBK9?^^

XI-HC-22.:,\:'-;.''~,^%:':^1^;-W^^;,.',.',;^

:M\^^::^3,"^:K^s:|^^^^^'^i^'a^^^

an^E,^; 'r<;-<isb3:n^igmWHft'iT

r TIST^;^SSM^"^lK^tt'•::./-:'.:'..'

'•::./-:'.:'..'%:Mi+i?ii:'a?n!<®^:?.~ •.

'^'"•^•"'••''^''•'•"•f^St''''''^

'*j'iiiy<ilSi/BJHg6S%Si^SsySsy^gSj

•swSr;B^nw 'fffiit.

\^

16-li2-^C»02

^SIiEi/^JiA. Lohani, Adv. with|fbr tfae petitioner.; •^:^^^^^^.•

Sfln SuTyaiiautMisUia.coun.sel

'•^foctheState. -,

SIu-t Ranbir Suigh, GQvt. Advj"Heard.. ^-.. /] /]

. /] /]

TIus yrait petitipirwas j5led1a||Septeinber 2001 ftff ailirectipu|to the opposite part^^to release ti^esalar^ wliieh is^^lue-;. tb 'the:Ipetitioner IrOin^Aprit; gC^t^^^^o^|1^;QII[the]prevKnis''^IateIhearing fhe State couasel was dire<j;lbted to (^tain insti'uetiohs and|fhe Ccnirt liad also expressettAts c}[isplea.sure for iion-paylnent ofthe saJaiy to tjKe petitioner, who i^a Class-rv eiaplovee.'Qn theIbasis of fhe instrUetfci&s received li|yftie Statecounsel it jq. stated|that,;Bie salaiY due.to.fiaer petitione)stasxis paM. ^inittedly, ;fhje<Ipayineots ^were inade. ^after Bljtig |flf fflu&^ ^luffifcTtuaiate ^ttia.t thisv facf wss;;n6)itoHyuglrt^to the^^^Be^tU.a^asCourt by fhe coulisel ifor ftic petitiic|iigr itanay,<as •fheisalajy stasdsm.0 furfher action is Ealled ftir paM^^^/peti^ase]^ui this TOrifcpetitu^^triiiGlii^taads^^s@es^o£^^'.^,^j'^:;::^.:^;.':.^y:^^^^ '. Coiisequeatly J..ftt No.3833^^002 fer urgent liearing alsQ!starids(lisposed 6£|

|

Sd/-p.C.NaikJudge

~['^:pfia|«