Gujarat High Court
SCA/5354/1985 of RAJNIKANT N SHETH Vs DIST.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE on 5 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5354 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5354 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- RAJNIKANT N SHETH
Versus
DIST.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR YN OZA for Petitioner
MR LR PUJARI AGP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GPfor M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO forespondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respodent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MDOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for RespondentNo. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No.1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT &CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO f r Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP fr M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Repondent No. 1, 2GP for M/s MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2GP f -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 05/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI)
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition seems to have become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Ad interim relief stands vacated. Liberty to move in case of difficulty.
����***
(mohd)